FlyAim
0Sakura721 (@0Sakura721)
Drives a closed-loop aiming task from MaleCNS v1.0, 166,700 neurons and 25,582,938 edges, against a degree-preserving shuffle, a PID ceiling and a random floor on matched seeds and frame budgets. The pre-registered verdict is that the wiring makes no causal contribution, and the result is stronger: both network arms end up significantly further from the target than random, 412.5 and 430.9 pixels against 251.7. Making the connectome weights learnable under a three-factor rule failed all three gates too. The README insists what is refuted is this LIF model with static weights, not the fly.
Sources checked
Every fact above was read from these pages on the date the entry was added.
- raw.githubusercontent.com https://raw.githubusercontent.com/0Sakura721/flyaim/HEAD/README.md